- Bird Flu Virus in Canadian Teen Shows Mutations That Could Help It Spread Among Humans
- Flu, COVID Vaccination Rates Remain Low as Winter Nears
- ’10 Americas:’ Health Disparities Mean Life Expectancy Varies Across U.S.
- Short-Term Hormone Therapy for Menopause Won’t Harm Women’s Brains
- Could a Vitamin Be Effective Treatment for COPD?
- Woman Receives World’s First Robotic Double-Lung Transplant
- Flavored Vapes Behind Big Surge in U.S. E-Cigarette Sales
- Reading Beyond Headline Rare For Most on Social Media, Study Finds
- Meds Like Ozempic Are Causing Folks to Waste More Food
- Fibroids, Endometriosis Linked to Shorter Life Spans
States Claim Sackler Family Members Are Abusing Bankruptcy Process
A settlement that gives protections to Sackler family members who own Purdue Pharma should be rejected, a group of states told a federal judge on Tuesday.
The settlement was reached in thousands of lawsuits against OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma for its role in the United States’ opioid epidemic that’s claimed more than 500,000 lives in the past two decades.
Sackler family members removed more than $10 billion from the company, directed the funds toward bankruptcy, and then used a settlement crafted in bankruptcy court to gain legal protections for themselves, Washington state Solicitor General Noah Purcell told U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon, the Associated Press reported.
“If that is not an abuse of the bankruptcy process,” Purcell said, “it’s unclear what would be.”
Under the deal approved in September by a federal bankruptcy judge, members of the Sackler family would contribute more than $4 billion, plus the company itself, to fight the opioid epidemic, the AP reported.
In return, members of the family are to be protected from lawsuits accusing them of helping drive the opioid crisis, but they would not be shielded from criminal charges.
They’re not facing any at the moment, but a group of activists are urging federal authorities to bring charges against some of the Sackler family members, the AP reported.
By taking bigger distributions out of Purdue Pharma over the decade leading to the company’s bankruptcy filings, Sackler family members “made themselves necessary” to the negotiations over the settlement, the AP reported.
But lawyers for the family said the distributions were bigger because the company was making more money and that there’s no evidence any of them were trying to manipulating the bankruptcy system.
More information
Visit the National Institute of Drug Abuse for more on opioids.
Source: HealthDay
Copyright © 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.