- Navigating Your Midlife Crisis: Embracing New Possibilities
- City Raccoons Showing Signs of Domestication
- Mapping the Exposome: Science Broadens Focus to Environmental Disease Triggers
- One Week Less on Social Media Linked to Better Mental Health
- Your Brain Changes in Stages as You Age, Study Finds
- Some Suicide Victims Show No Typical Warning Signs, Study Finds
- ByHeart Formula Faces Lawsuits After Babies Sickened With Botulism
- Switch to Vegan Diet Could Cut Your Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Half
- Regular Bedtime Does Wonders for Blood Pressure
- Dining Alone Could Mean Worse Nutrition for Seniors
Surgery Not Better for Spine Narrowing, Study Finds

Surgery and more conservative treatments provide similar long-term outcomes for people with spinal stenosis, a new study suggests.
Spinal stenosis is narrowing of the spinal canal that leads to back and leg pain and other symptoms.
The study included more than 650 spinal stenosis patients who had surgery or received nonsurgical treatment such as physical therapy or medications. For the first several years, patients who had surgery had better outcomes.
However, after eight years of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pain, functioning or disability, according to the study in the Jan. 15 issue of the journal Spine.
Both surgery and more conservative treatments were safe, according to the researchers. Of the patients who had surgery, 18 percent had repeat surgery for recurrent spinal stenosis within eight years, said study leader Dr. Jon Lurie and colleagues in a journal news release. The study authors are from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H.
The findings provide important information for patients and doctors when considering treatments for spinal stenosis, the researchers said.
More information
The U.S. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases has more about spinal stenosis.
Source: HealthDay
Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.










