- Your Allergy Meds Come With Hazards: Be Aware
- Vaping Linked to Earlier Onset of Asthma
- FDA Approves New Drug for Deadly Lung Cancer
- U.S. Justice Department Moves to Reclassify Weed as Less Risky Drug
- Global Life Expectancy Could Rise By More Than 4 Years by 2050
- Most Cancer Treatments Near End of Life Are Useless: Study
- Brain’s ‘Food Smell’ Circuitry Might Drive Overeating
- The More Kids Use Social Media, The More They’re Likely to Vape
- Men Are More Debilitated by Diabetes Than Women
- Is Your Child Ready for Summer Sleepaway Camp?
Surgery Not Better for Spine Narrowing, Study Finds
Surgery and more conservative treatments provide similar long-term outcomes for people with spinal stenosis, a new study suggests.
Spinal stenosis is narrowing of the spinal canal that leads to back and leg pain and other symptoms.
The study included more than 650 spinal stenosis patients who had surgery or received nonsurgical treatment such as physical therapy or medications. For the first several years, patients who had surgery had better outcomes.
However, after eight years of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pain, functioning or disability, according to the study in the Jan. 15 issue of the journal Spine.
Both surgery and more conservative treatments were safe, according to the researchers. Of the patients who had surgery, 18 percent had repeat surgery for recurrent spinal stenosis within eight years, said study leader Dr. Jon Lurie and colleagues in a journal news release. The study authors are from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H.
The findings provide important information for patients and doctors when considering treatments for spinal stenosis, the researchers said.
More information
The U.S. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases has more about spinal stenosis.
Source: HealthDay
Copyright © 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.