- Tips for Spending Holiday Time With Family Members Who Live with Dementia
- Tainted Cucumbers Now Linked to 100 Salmonella Cases in 23 States
- Check Your Pantry, Lay’s Classic Potato Chips Recalled Due to Milk Allergy Risk
- Norovirus Sickens Hundreds on Three Cruise Ships: CDC
- Not Just Blabber: What Baby’s First Vocalizations and Coos Can Tell Us
- What’s the Link Between Memory Problems and Sexism?
- Supreme Court to Decide on South Carolina’s Bid to Cut Funding for Planned Parenthood
- Antibiotics Do Not Increase Risks for Cognitive Decline, Dementia in Older Adults, New Data Says
- A New Way to Treat Sjögren’s Disease? Researchers Are Hopeful
- Some Abortion Pill Users Surprised By Pain, Study Says
California Judge Sides With Drug Companies in Opioid Lawsuit
A California judge has ruled against local governments that sued drug companies for billions of dollars to recover their costs of dealing with the opioid epidemic.
In a tentative ruling issued Monday, Orange County Superior Court Judge Peter Wilson rejected the plaintiffs’ claims the companies used deceptive marketing to increase unnecessary prescriptions of opioid painkillers, the Associated Press reported.
“There is simply no evidence to show that the rise in prescriptions was not the result of the medically appropriate provision of pain medications to patients in need,” Wilson wrote in a ruling that entailed more than 40 pages, the AP reported.
The lawsuit by Los Angeles, Orange and Santa Clara counties and the city of Oakland names Johnson & Johnson, AbbVie Inc.’s Allergan subsidiary, Endo International, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and other companies in its lawsuit.
While disappointed by the ruling, the local governments said they planned to appeal to “ensure no opioid manufacturer can engage in reckless corporate practices that compromise public health in the state for their own profit,” the AP reported.
The drug companies “successfully transformed the way doctors treat chronic pain, opening the floodgates of opioid prescribing and use,” the lawsuit contends. “This explosion in opioid prescriptions and use has padded Defendants’ profit margins at the expense of chronic pain patients.”
The plaintiffs projected that it could cost $50 billion to provide comprehensive opioid abatement programs in the four jurisdictions that filed the lawsuit, the AP reported. The money would go for things like ongoing opioid abuse prevention and treatment programs in Los Angeles and Santa Clara counties.
Nearly a half-million Americans have died from opioid abuse since 2001, the AP reported.
The drug companies welcomed the judge’s ruling. In a statement, Johnson & Johnson said the decision showed it engaged in “appropriate and responsible” marketing of its opioid medications, the AP reported.
Thousands of similar lawsuits have been filed nationwide by cities, counties and states, but this was just the second such case to go to trial. In 2019, an Oklahoma judge ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $465 million, but the company is appealing the decision, the AP reported.
Other lawsuits have resulted in large settlements or proposed settlements.
More information
Visit the National Institute on Drug Abuse for more on opioids.
SOURCE: Associated Press
Source: HealthDay
Copyright © 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.