- Tips for Spending Holiday Time With Family Members Who Live with Dementia
- Tainted Cucumbers Now Linked to 100 Salmonella Cases in 23 States
- Check Your Pantry, Lay’s Classic Potato Chips Recalled Due to Milk Allergy Risk
- Norovirus Sickens Hundreds on Three Cruise Ships: CDC
- Not Just Blabber: What Baby’s First Vocalizations and Coos Can Tell Us
- What’s the Link Between Memory Problems and Sexism?
- Supreme Court to Decide on South Carolina’s Bid to Cut Funding for Planned Parenthood
- Antibiotics Do Not Increase Risks for Cognitive Decline, Dementia in Older Adults, New Data Says
- A New Way to Treat Sjögren’s Disease? Researchers Are Hopeful
- Some Abortion Pill Users Surprised By Pain, Study Says
Appeals Court Upholds Restrictions on Abortion Pill
THURSDAY, Aug. 17, 2023 (HealthDay News) – The abortion pill mifepristone should remain legal in the United States, but with significant restrictions on access to it, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.
The decision, issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans, effectively sets the stage for a showdown before the Supreme Court on the fate of the drug.
The lower court ruling from Texas that the federal appeals court weighed would have fully revoked the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the medication back in 2000. Instead, this latest decision will end availability of the drug by mail or telemedicine. The three-judge panel also said mifepristone can only be used through seven weeks, instead of 10, and the drug will be required to be administered with a doctor present.
“In loosening mifepristone’s safety restrictions, [the] FDA failed to address several important concerns about whether the drug would be safe for the women who use it,” wrote Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, a George W. Bush appointee to the Fifth Circuit.
But the American Medical Association (AMA) took issue with the new ruling.
“Today’s decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals continues to signal a move in the wrong direction on access to mifepristone, potentially eliminating the ability to prescribe and dispense mifepristone via telemedicine and reinstating barriers to access that lack scientific evidence,” said Dr. Jack Resneck, immediate past president of the AMA. “While this decision preserves the original approval of Mifeprex and generic mifepristone, this action will undoubtedly negatively impact patients across the country if left in place.”
“Research shows an association between restricted access to safe and legal abortion and higher rates of maternal morbidity and mortality, with already vulnerable populations experiencing the greatest burden,” Resneck added. “Reduced access to mifepristone will almost certainly exacerbate the maternal mortality crisis in places that do not have access to this medication.”
However, none of the restrictions will happen yet because the Supreme Court intervened in April to allow availability of the drug while the Texas case works its way through the courts.
“Today’s ruling does not affect the availability of mifepristone. It remains FDA-approved and available in many states across the country, including via telehealth,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. “But the 5th Circuit’s opinion makes it clear that mifepristone’s approval is very much still at risk, as is the FDA’s independence. Pregnant people should be the ones who make decisions about their own health care, and medical professionals should be the ones who make evidence-based decisions about the safety of medications — not judges. The Supreme Court should reject this clearly baseless and political attempt to interfere with our ability to get health care.”
The Supreme Court, which will likely act in the coming months, could deny review, leaving in place the appeals court’s ruling, curbing access to the pill. Or it could agree to hear the appeal, throwing the future of the abortion pill in doubt, the New York Times reported.
The original Texas lawsuit was filed by conservative Christian group the Alliance Defending Freedom. An earlier lawsuit filed by that group led to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade after nearly five decades.
Reacting to the news, the alliance issued a statement applauding the ruling.
“The 5th Circuit rightly required the FDA to do its job and restore crucial safeguards for women and girls, including ending illegal mail-order abortions,” said Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) Senior Counsel Erin Hawley, who is also vice president of the ADF Center for Life and Regulatory Practice.
“The FDA will finally be made to account for the damage it has caused to the health of countless women and girls and the rule of law by unlawfully removing every meaningful safeguard from the chemical abortion drug regimen,” she added. “The FDA’s unprecedented and unlawful actions did not reflect scientific judgment but rather revealed politically driven decisions to push a dangerous drug regimen without regard to women’s health or the rule of law. This is a significant victory for the doctors and medical associations we represent and, more importantly, the health and safety of women.”
Health care providers have said they will switch to using only the other drug used in the typically two-drug medication abortions. That medication, misoprostol, is somewhat less effective, the AP reported.
More information
The nonprofit KFF has more on the use of medication abortion.
SOURCE: American Medical Association, news release, Aug. 16, 2023; Alliance Defending Freedom, news release, Aug. 16, 2023; Planned Parenthood, news release, Aug. 16, 2023; Associated Press; New York Times
Source: HealthDay
Copyright © 2024 HealthDay. All rights reserved.